Skip to main content
Conference Proceedings

Iron Ore 2015

Conference Proceedings

Iron Ore 2015

PDF Add to cart

Project Development and Regulation Red Tape - A Comparative Analysis: Does It Need to Be So Complex?

Mining exploration and development projects in Australia are being negatively affected by the highly complex regulatory and bureaucratic processes at all levels of government. These processes affect mining companies operating in Australia by impacting on timelines and the cost of developing a mining project. It is not uncommon for the granting of project approvals to take in excess of five years, meaning that mining companies struggle with productivity, efficiency, time frame and cost issues in respect to their projects in Australia. As the mining boom in Australia is moving from the investment to the production phase, it is now more important than ever to maintain a regulatory landscape that facilitates rather than discourages new investment.While one of our key arguments is that there is too much burdensome regulation and red tape in Australia, we are also strongly believe that regulatory intervention is necessary to ensure that appropriate checks and balances are in place to serve the public interest and manage environmental, health and safety, social and other development-related impacts that may arise from a mining project. However, the regulatory intervention in Australia has come to a point where it is excessive and starting to discourage valuable investment in mining projects for nominal return to the public. Excessive regulation or red tape' impedes productivity and competitiveness, deters investment and innovation and costs jobs, all of which ultimately impact on the growth of Australia and the standard of living of all Australians.This paper aims to examine and compare the federal, state and local regulations that govern mining projects in Australia. It will highlight how these regulations are unnecessarily complex, lengthy and duplicated and how they can be streamlined to reduce red tape. In doing so, the paper will evaluate the recommendations proposed by the Productivity Commission Report on Major Project Assessments released in 2013, which include the recommendation to move to a one project, one assessment, one decision' regulatory model.CITATION:Pope, C and Tannock, M, 2015. Project development and regulation red tape - a comparative analysis: does it need to be so complex?, in Proceedings Iron Ore 2015, pp 621-630 (The Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy: Melbourne).
Return to parent product
  • Project Development and Regulation Red Tape - A Comparative Analysis: Does It Need to Be So Complex?
    PDF
    This product is exclusive to Digital library subscription
  • Project Development and Regulation Red Tape - A Comparative Analysis: Does It Need to Be So Complex?
    PDF
    Normal price $22.00
    Member price from $0.00
    Add to cart

    Fees above are GST inclusive

PD Hours
Approved activity
  • Published: 2014
  • PDF Size: 0.261 Mb.
  • Unique ID: P201505079

Our site uses cookies

We use these to improve your browser experience. By continuing to use the website you agree to the use of cookies.