Skip to main content
Conference Proceedings

Mine Planning and Equipment Selection (MPES) 2010

Conference Proceedings

Mine Planning and Equipment Selection (MPES) 2010

PDF Add to cart

Mining the LG6 Chromitite Layer - A Comparison of Two Approaches

Underlain by and intruded into the sedimentary rocks of the Transvaal Supergroup the Bushveld Complex is the largest known layered intrusion in the world and contains one of the richest ore deposits on earth. It has been the world's major source of Platinum Group Metals (PGM) since the mid-1900s with Chromite and PGMs the two most economically important components of the Bushveld Complex. The lower group (LG), within the critical zone, consists of seven chromitite layers and it is within this sequence of chromitite layers, the most important target of the lower chromitite group is found, ie the LG6 chromitite unit. The LG6 chromitite unit consists of a chromitite duplex composed of the lower LG6 chromitite layer (Steelport seam), averaging 1 m thick, overlain by a 0.66 m waste parting and a thin 0.34 m thick LG6a chromitite layer (leader layer).Two mining methods are commonly applied in the Bushveld Complex to extract the LG6 chromitite layer package. One method consists of footwall development utilising rail bound equipment to gain access to the orebody and then extracts only the LG6 chromitite layer by means of hand held rock drills and scraper winches. The second method is the use of mechanised equipment to access the orebody on the plane of the ore utilising bord and pillar mining method, which extracts the full mineral resource, ie the LG6 and LG6a layers._x000D_
Conventional narrow vein stoping is often selected due to the large conventional mining skills base found in South Africa, the perceived cost and dilution implications of utilising mechanised equipment, and the difficulties of using mechanised equipment at dips above 12. The driving factor for mechanised mining is the perceived ability to access the orebody quickly and inexpensively, and extract the entire mineral resource package (LG6 and LG6a) while limiting capital expenditure and improving safety. This paper investigates these two commonly applied approaches, highlighting the benefits and problems associated with the two approaches. Comparisons will be made of the two mining methods and recommendations given for the mining engineer to consider before selecting the appropriate mine design._x000D_
FORMAL CITATION:Rupprecht, S M, 2010. Mining the LG6 chromitite layer - a comparison of two approaches, in Proceedings Mine Planning and Equipment Selection (MPES) 2010, pp 547-560 (The Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy: Melbourne).
Return to parent product
  • Mining the LG6 Chromitite Layer - A Comparison of Two Approaches
    PDF
    This product is exclusive to Digital library subscription
  • Mining the LG6 Chromitite Layer - A Comparison of Two Approaches
    PDF
    Normal price $22.00
    Member price from $0.00
    Add to cart

    Fees above are GST inclusive

PD Hours
Approved activity
  • Published: 2010
  • PDF Size: 1.518 Mb.
  • Unique ID: P201011054

Our site uses cookies

We use these to improve your browser experience. By continuing to use the website you agree to the use of cookies.