Quantification of mineral concentrations is crucial for planning efficient and economical ore extraction, metals processing and mine waste management (Berry et al., 2016). Several analytical methods are available to automatically identify minerals, including sulphides, e.g. Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM), Laser Raman Spectroscopy and X-ray diffraction (XRD). These methods operate at microscopic scales and require samples to be prepared prior to analysis, hence, they can be time consuming to carry out and problematic when scaled to represent mining ore and waste materials (Goodall et al., 2005; Berry et al., 2016).The use of visible and near infrared (VNIR), shortwave infrared (SWIR), and more recently thermal infrared (TIR) scanning systems for mineral identification are well established and offer rapid, cheap and non-destructive methods for characterising rock mineralogy drill core scales (Schodlok et al., 2016). Despite their advantages, VNIR (4501100 nm), SWIR (11002500 nm) and TIR (1.114.5 m) systems are only useful for the identification of minerals that are active in these portions of the electromagnetic spectrum. Sulphides, which are economically and environmentally important minerals, typically do not have characteristic absorption features in VNIR, SWIR and TIR wavelengths (Bolin and Moon, 2003; Merrill et al., 2016). Nevertheless, recent research suggests that TIR wavelengths of around 7.6 m can be used to identify sulphide minerals (Merrill et al., 2016). Furthermore, iron-sulphides have been identified from hyperspectral drill core images (across VNIR wavelengths) using supervised classification (Bolin and Moon, 2003). This approach exploited iron-sulphide mineral colour and albedo to distinguish them from other minerals. CITATION: Cracknell, M J, Parbhakar-Fox, A, Jackson, L, Fox, N and Savinova, E, 2019. Automated identification of sulphides from drill core imagery, in Proceedings PACRIM 2019, pp 7982 (The Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy: Melbourne).