Skip to main content

The AusIMM office is closed for the end of year break until Monday 6 January 2025. Please note members can pay their renewals online at ausimm.com/renew, and hardcopy publication orders will be processed on our return. We wish you a safe and happy festive season.

Conference Proceedings

Project Evaluation 2016

Conference Proceedings

Project Evaluation 2016

PDF Add to cart

Project Evaluation - A Non-Executive Director's Perspective

In project evaluation there are two matters of keen interest to non-executive directors: the process by which an investment recommendation is reached, as well as the investment itself, as presented. It is sometimes mistakenly believed that Boards of directors are interested only in the result. That is not so. The process by which project evaluations are derived and socialised with the Board is as important as the result, sometimes more so._x000D_
Setting aside the gloomy predictions of the doomsayers and looking through short-term volatility in supply and demand, the overall availability of mineral resources more often than not exceeds demand. There are in reality more development projects in prospect at any one time than are needed to meet the market. Only the fittest will prosper, although some others may survive._x000D_
Optimism springs eternal in the mining industry and every project promoter, executive or entrepreneur has a convincing project development case. Some will create value for shareholders, but the historical evidence suggests that many will fail to meet the expectations set in their evaluation._x000D_
Boards of directors make the final decision to invest, or not, in a new mine. Knowledge is power, and on that basis the balance of power favours management. Management has the facts (or in some cases, what passes for fact) and the passion to invest. The non-executives have the power of approval - yes or no - but before making a decision directors must demonstrate due diligence, the essential precursor to project approval._x000D_
Management has a vital part to play in facilitating that due diligence process and in encouraging the independent thought processes of the Board. A closed approach by management fosters a negative, risk-averse attitude on the part of the Board. One that encourages an understanding of the rigour of the project evaluation process and the robustness of the result will allow directors to understand better the implications of their decision._x000D_
CITATION: Knight, R, 2016. Project evaluation - a non-executive director's perspective, in Proceedings Project Evaluation 2016, pp 11-19 (The Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy: Melbourne).
Return to parent product
  • Project Evaluation - A Non-Executive Director's Perspective
    PDF
    This product is exclusive to Digital library subscription
  • Project Evaluation - A Non-Executive Director's Perspective
    PDF
    Normal price $22.00
    Member price from $0.00
    Add to cart

    Fees above are GST inclusive

PD Hours
Approved activity
  • Published: 2016
  • PDF Size: 0.536 Mb.
  • Unique ID: P201601002

Our site uses cookies

We use these to improve your browser experience. By continuing to use the website you agree to the use of cookies.